Round of 16 Wrap Up
I'm running a bit behind on the end of my round of 16 review and some of you have asked for it, so here goes...
Italy vs. Australia
![]() Men sucking their thumbs are clearly the villains of a story. |
I was right in that the Aussies gave Italy everything they could handle in this game and more, it just made me sad to see them bow out on something so dubious. As for the Italians, dubious is all they do...
Switzerland vs. Ukraine
My sources behind the scenes have informed me of the following: In addition to the memo to the ref that FIFA sent before this game instructing him to give no cards until after the 60th minute, there was an additional memo sent to the teams that told them all players completing dangerous through balls from the midfield into a good attacking position would be executed by firing squad after the game with no possibility of appeal. Sometimes serious measures have to be taken, I guess. Good thing no one defied them in this game, or it might have looked like football.
Believe it or not, I watched 120 minutes of this game and then turned it off. I just couldn't watch the penalty kicks and care anymore. Ukraine won. I hope desperately that they don't win again. Has any team had a more improbable, goof-grab run in this tournament? Sure, they beat Saudi Arabia by a lot. That was the only game they played remotely well in. They needed a gift penalty to score at all against Tunisia and then failed to do anything against the Swiss (who (by the way) bow out of the tournament without conceding a single goal. Now that's pretty fucked up, right there.), yet they still find themselves facing the Italians in the quarterfinals. One good game, make it to the Top 8.
Clown shoes...
Brazil vs. Ghana
If Ghana had anyone in their lineup who could finish, and if the linesman had called the double offside on Adriano's goal, this game might have been spicy even without Michael Essien. As it was, you got the best move of the tournament from Ronaldo, some mind-blowingly bad offside trap work from the Ghanaian defense, and Brazil cruise into the quarters without having played that well yet.
Spain vs. France
![]() Patty is taking fat hits from the fountain of youth. |
The Spanish may blame Thierry Henry's flop for their failure, but they should be pointing the finger at the mirror instead. Spain had plenty of decent chances for more goals, but they simply did not convert, unexpected considering how lethal they were in Group stage. The French defense was decent but not spectacular, and if Spain had hit a single more goal at any point before Zidane's reminder of how good he is, they probably win this game. I don't believe Spain were caught unawares by how good the French are, but I do think Aragones made a hefty mistake in starting Raul as an attacking midfielder when his lineup in games 1 and 2 worked so well without Raul in there. I'm sad to see the Spaniards go - they played beautiful football and probably should have been bashing the Swiss instead of the French, but I can't complain about seeing France make it through.
With Zidane and Viera sucking full bore off the fountain of youth, this team could go all the way. One merely wonders how long the juice from the rejuvenation machine will last.
Oh, and that racist prick Aragones absolutely has to go. It's difficult to believe Spain kept him on after the first set of comments, but wanting to keep him on after a perfectly valid excuse to give him the axe is absurd. Is the entire country crazy?
Beautiful (Broken) Feedback
It seems my blurb for this entry on some of the World Cup journal communities completely left the audience behind, which was unexpected but I guess shouldn't have been. Aside from that, the post seems to have spawned quite a bit of thought from those who read it, which was exactly what it was supposed to do.
On The Pitch has a good response to it that includes a point I didn't directly address in my post itself: Perhaps the biggest failing of referees at the World Cup has been the lack of consistency. As I mentioned in my comments there, I view this one as a given. All referees are going to call things slightly differently and have to be heavily trained if you want to change it, and if FIFA can't put refs in a position to get even that right, then there's little hope for anything else.
A couple more points about yesterday's post before I actually do my work for today and get started on the Quarterfinals predictions:
* I'm not married to any and all of the ideas discussed yesterday. Of the controversial bits, I actually like the blue cards concept the best because I think it would add the most value to the product.
* In said blue cards system, yellow cards still exist for most of the fouls they exist for now. Blue are for minor offenses, yellow are for medium to major offenses, and red means Marvin K. Mooney, would you please go now.
* FIFA is clearly setting referees up to fail with the support they are delivering. With modern communication technology, mistakes like the Graham Poll not sending off a player for his second red card (in the Croatia vs. Australia match) simply should not happen. It should not be a problem for his fourth official to get his attention over the radio and give the player the boot. This whole issue feels like it’s plagued by a cloud of stupidity.




7 Comments:
"Oh, and that racist prick Aragones absolutely has to go. It's difficult to believe Spain kept him on after the first set of comments, but wanting to keep him on after a perfectly valid excuse to give him the axe is absurd. Is the entire country crazy?"
What are exactly referring to???
Ok, Spain played bad, but why do you think Aragones is a racist prick?
This was a huge deal previously and came back up recently because the target of some of Aragones' racist remarks just happens to be a star on the French team. google has approximately a million hits on this of you want more info. Here's a quickie:
" France defender Mikael Silvestre believes Spain coach Luis Aragones should have been suspended for his racist remarks about Thierry Henry.
Speaking ahead of Tuesday's World Cup last 16 match between Spain and France in Hanover, Silvestre revealed Aragones' comments - when he referred to Henry as a "black ****" during a Spain training session - had offended not only Henry but many others as well.
Silvestre - Aragones should have been banned.
Silvestre said: "We disapprove of that kind of comment even if it was in the context of a training session.
"There are ways to motivate players without that kind of language."
Aragones made his remarks as he was trying to urge Jose Antonio Reyes to prove he was better than Henry.
Silvestre continued: "Everyone was talking about it. A coach shouldn't talk like that as he is meant to set an example."
The Manchester United player, who will probably be replaced against Spain by Eric Abidal, believed the nominal fine imposed on the coach was not a sufficient penalty.
"He should have been suspended for a while," said Silvestre. "The World Cup is a good place and I don't think there is much racism - let's avoid that."
Comparing the situation in Spain to England, Silvestre said: "England made a choice to rid the game of hooligans and now it's safe to go to the stadium again." "
"Speaking ahead of Tuesday's World Cup last 16 match between Spain and France in Hanover, Silvestre revealed Aragones' comments - when he referred to Henry as a "black ****" during a Spain training session - had offended not only Henry but many others as well"
I would like news journalists knew a little more about spanish translation.
Aragones didn't say "black S***", he said "negro de mierda". That means something like "f***ing black guy". It is not the same.
The former is more serious and more offensive, in my opinion, than the lattest.
I'd like to say that in Spain we cannot be racist. We truly can't. There are people (really few) that doesn't like other people because of the place they are from (other countries). Yeah, we even have some nazi dumb and worthless youth people like in US, German or France, a virus we have to eradicate. But in Spain, that people is REEEEAAAALLLY dumb.
Because we can't be truly racist. See? Spain has been forged with the blood and unions of arabics, germanics, celtic, french, jews, african, romanics, et cetera. It'd be stupid to be racist. Here are few the people who is black, but fewer who is truly white. "American" white. I even considered myself white until I went to US, and suddenly I became "dark".
But anyway, Aragones can be anything but racist. I'm sick of the news bringing out comments out of context. Aragones said an unfortunate statement, but he didn't intend it to be racist.
Bit harsh on Italy. I thought they played really well in that match. With some good finishing they could have been up multiple goals after the first half. Even after going down to ten, Austrialia despite how much of the ball they had never looked like scoring. probably wasn't a penalty but the defender can't really complaim there was no reason to dive in. If he stays on his feat nothing can go wrong. Never seen such a stupid tackle.
In my opinion Spain lost mostly because of the way their defense played. Having the backline that far up against someone as fast as Henry is just suicidal. Several times they got lucky that he was barely offside but when Ribery scored their luck had run out.
/Anton
I think you are probably right, Anton, which just goes to further illustrate my point that Aragones must go. I also still don't understand why he juggles his lineup there either. Spain had plenty of chances - if they converted anywhere near the success rate of Brazil (recently, anyway), we likely wouldn't be having this conversation.
Think you're wrong about the penalty. Yes, Grosso was looking for it, but as a defender you can't leave your feet in the penalty area and feel hard done by when something like that happens. Fact is, anywhere else on the pitch, that's a free kick. It doesn't stop being a foul just because it's in the penalty area. Soft, but the right decision, IMO.
And there are three other things:
1) After the Italy - South Korea game in 2002 (and for that matter Spain - South Korea), Guus Hiddink has no right talking about dodgy refeering decisions, since the referres basically handed South Korea a semi-final.
2) It's quite funny watching Australians whine about cheating, when they - as a nation - hardly play fair on the sports field.
3) Lucas Neill has had that coming since his shocking challenge on Jamie Carragher in 2003. Serves him right.
Post a Comment
<< Home